Twitter RSS

May
16

JCP: Turns Out Consumers ARE Addicted to a Deal

Just when you thought JCP expectations might be low enough? Nope. Not even close.

Turns out the American consumer is addicted to a deal. Problem is the JCP management team did not realize just how much their customer is addicted to the coupon drug. Weaning them off their addiction looks like a bigger challenge than Ron Johnson had originally anticipated.

Comps for Q1 plunged 18.9% and the reported loss was more than 2x expectations. Traffic was the main issue and for the foreseeable future I am not sure why that would change. Traffic declined 10%. High traffic weekends, were simply not high traffic and declined 12% year over year (notably weekends are skewed to the bargain hunting coupon wavers). The weekday traffic was down a kinder 6% but that did not exactly make investors feel any better in the packed out venue where the post mortem earnings meeting took place. The trend in sales throughout the quarter also did not make us feel any better. February declined 21% and improved by 300 basis points for March/April. The company also pointed out conversion rates only declined 100 bps to 21% from 22%, not so bad when consumers may be confused by pricing/signage changes in the stores. Now that is making lemonade out of lemons.

Also turns out the marketing message may not be getting across. While less promotions save the company plenty of dough (repricing store signs was costing $50M per year as there were 590 of them last year) customers are still driven in to stores by a deal. The advertised “best price friday” has not resonated as expected, in fact customers might have thought Friday was the only shot based on the marketing message. As a result the message will be changed to “the big deal starts today”. The company will now highlight the new discounted price vs the everyday low price. Not surprising “basics” (underwear, socks) have suffered. When it comes to fashion consumers are willing to pay up but when it comes to basics pricing rules. While in the end consumers may not be paying more than they used to with every day low pricing the lack of in your face promos is a case of perception is reality.

While JCP tells us the transformation is ahead of schedule the bottom line is sales are not. Cost cutting (and there is plenty of it in this story) is low hanging fruit. Cost opportunities will now exceed the previously announced $900M, although they wont tell us by how much. Problem is cost cutting stories have a shelf life (flashbacks of RadioShack). In the longer term keeping the core consumer AND/OR capturing the new younger consumer is key. While we are early in the transformation game so far JCP changes are alienating the core and not attracting the new. While new brands may change that this will not happen overnight and certainly not this year.

While JCP wowed us with new brands in the pipeline (Cynthia Rowley, Tourneau, Michael Graves, Betsey Johnson, Vivienne Tam, Lulu Guiness, a hip JCP looking brand pipeline, broader Nike product and fancy looking store within stores) the question is how long will investores wait? This transformation will take time and today investors showed their lack of patience.


Social Share Button

Apr
30

Sales Preview; Europe/JC Penney May Give Weather Blame Game Competition

 Europe and JC Penney may give the weather blame game a run for its money

Winter never came this year and as a result apparel retailers reported generally ugly sales and gross margin numbers for Q4.  Remember those margins from the teen retailers which declined as much as 1000 basis points? Promotions ruled as retailers tried in vain to move cold related product.  Weather was an easy “out” for retailers to blame.

Fast forward to recent Spring results. This time the weather was something to celebrate. Last month same store sales results blew away expectations. Lower heating bills have put a few extra dollars in the consumer wallets.  And the early start to Spring has inspired shoppers to rush into stores in search of bright colored jeans and tank tops.  Luckily for retailers color is “in” this Spring. Spring Fever has given investors hope even when it comes to the longest turnaround stories (the Gap). Only time will tell if sales were being pulled forward or the consumer has staying power.

Just as we were getting a bit euphoric about recent results, DECK and CROX gave us a reality check last week.  Turns out while investors may be quick to forget, retailers are still holding a grudge.  Both companies suggested the channel fears winter is a thing of the past. As a result, orders for next Fall/Winter are under pressure.   Not only is there left over product from last year but there is also caution about taking a stance on wintery wears.  DECK cited the weather no less than 30x on their conference call.  And let’s not leave out a disappointing announcement from Big Lots (BIG). Comps for Q1 will miss expectations. And that is even with a lift from the weather bump in lawn and garden.

While retailers are adjusting to the fickleness of mothe r -nature this may actually be good news in the long run.  Tight inventories going into any season create scarcity of product and result in limited markdowns.  That was pretty much the theme post-recession as some retailers reported they did not take big enough bets on product. Fear can actually be a healthy thing for profitability.

If recent weather gyrations don’t give us enough concern don’t forget Europe.  The UK is now officially in recession and Southern Europe speaks for itself.  DECK, CROX, SBUX and to a lesser extent VFC raised a few red flags. While DECK is a believer that the Queen’s Jubilee and the Olympics may come to the retail rescue I wouldn’t bet on it.  Interesting times for US retailers to be placing new bets on the region (ANF, COH, LULU, LTD, GPS, TJX). The good news is a few of these retailers should persevere as a result of voids in the market (TJX, LTD, LULU).

As we approach same store sales results on Thursday let’s throw one last wrench in the mix for retailers not in search of growth in Europe. Yes, that is JC Penney. While Ron Johnson’s new strategy for JCP may or may not be a success it has implications for vendors and competitors.  Jones Group (JNY) is losing distribution while JCP will focus on 80-100 store within stores and new brands.  More announcements on who is “in or out” at JCP are on the way.  As for the competition (M, TGT, KSS) it may take more than pricing to get customers back into the stores.

Seems retailers have more to worry about than mother -nature this earnings season


Social Share Button

Apr
16

LULU Lands in London; Continues Under Radar Screen

LULU ventured out of its core North America comfort zone this weekend and officially landed in London.

this article appears on cnbc.com Consumer Nation April 17, 2012

With the Olympics right around the corner what better time to dip your toe in the market?

You didn’t hear the news? That is probably because it was not in the news and that is the way the company prefers it. Unless you follow LULU on Facebook or Twitter, sorry to report you missed the first free yoga class at the showroom this weekend. I attended and can report yoga is still much harder than it looks and I am pretty positive a headstand is not in my future. Not to worry you will get your chance to balance upside down in the unassuming London showroom. Not only has LULU brought its technical fabrics across the pond (that in my opinion will fill a market void-Sweatty Betty is the major game in town and not nearly as technical), but it also brought its weekly free classes.

How is it possible that a retailer with the #4th highest sales per square foot in retail ($2004/sq ft) only behind Apple, TIF and COH not to mention same stores sales growth of 20% last year, does not precede an international launch with a splashy marketing campaign? The answer is because they don’t have to. Despite the ability to spend, the company puts limited emphasis on traditional advertising. Instead, LULU continues to brand build through grassroots efforts. And based on how this strategy has worked so far why mess with a good thing?

Here is how it works. LULU introduces its brand in a market by scouring the local area for the best potential brand ambassadors. Think the top yoga teachers in town or well-known local athletes that are not only passionate about their sport but also involved in their community. The program is very much a two way street. The ambassador teaches free classes, promotes the brand/lifestyle and gives the company feedback on product. In return they may get free kit and the ability to build their own business by being a part of the LULU local team.

In addition, the company will seek out strategic partners such as yoga or pilates studios. It is probably not a coincidence the LULU showroom is located next to one of the top pilates studios in London, Heartcore. The process of getting to know the market and pin pointing the best ambassadors/partners may take as long as 18 months before a showroom/store is opened (as in the case of the London location).

In recent years we have seen examples of retailers entering the UK market in search of square footage growth after exhausting US opportunities only to falter (ANF). LULU is a different story. The company does not need to chase square footage growth abroad just for the sake of growth. Rather LULU has ample growth left in the US market with opportunity to triple the store base. In addition, innovation and new categories (surf, swim spin) are expected to drive mid teen comps this year. Finally playing catch-up to Canadian store productivity as well as the growth in the higher margin e-commerce category should keep investors occupied.

International may just be the icing on the cake.


Social Share Button

Apr
10

Best Buy:Too bad Ron Johnson spoken for…If JC Penney doesn’t work there is a desk in MN.

Today Brian Dunn, CEO of Best Buy, announced he will leave the company after 28 years.

In a recent blog “Note to Best Buy: Sales Rule So Cost Cuts Just Won’t ‘Cut It’” I outlined the continuing headwinds in the brick and mortar CE business (online, online and more online) as well as why going the route of cost cutting at Best Buy will not solve the problem. After all, investors will only tolerate sales declines for only so long. Recently Best Buy projected comp stores sales declines of 2-4% on top of years of negative results.

Time is up. And investors have voted with the stock price, which has declined -26% over the past year.

Can we blame Brian Dunn for Best Buy’s current woes?

While many are pointing to Dunn’s shortcomings as a CEO lets look at a bit of history. The announcement Dunn would become CEO came in January 2009. That was during the time Circuit City, the #2 CE retailer was liquidating stores. In fact the announcement that Dunn would take the helm came within days after Circuit announced it would liquidate all remaining 500+ stores. The market share story was off and running and a “store guy” (Dunn started as a sales associate in 1985 and was named President of North America Retail in 2004) with a long company history seemed to be the obvious candidate.

If the Board could re-write history maybe an online exec would have made more sense. Three years later we now understand the true impact of online competition and the simple commoditization of CE products. To put it simply, we now understand just how much shoppers are using physical stores as a showroom and buy cheaper online. Should Dunn have seen the light sooner and been more aggressive with store closures? Sure. The recent announcement the company would close 50 stores was too little too late.

We can also point to execution mishaps as recently as this holiday season. Best Buy was accused of being the Grinch this past holiday as orders placed as early as Black Friday went unfulfilled in time for Christmas. Bottom line, Public Relations disaster. When shoppers can get it cheaper elsewhere you can’t screw these things up.

But let’s not put all the blame on Dunn. And let’s not forget some other debacles we have seen from Best Buy. These were not on Dunn’s watch, rather, he inherited them. Take the Carphone Warehouse JV announced in May 2008 and the UK big box roll-out schedule. This couldn’t have come at a worse time for UK retail. The first stores were open less than a year before the plug was pulled on the roll-out. Best Buy branded stores in Turkey and China met the same fate.

The question now is who if anyone can turn this ship around? Store closures are a move in the right direction but probably can’t come fast enough for investors.

Too bad Ron Johnson is spoken for…If JC Penney doesn’t work out I am betting there is a desk for him in Richfield, MN.


Social Share Button

Mar
29

Best Buy; Cost Cuts Just Won’t Cut It

Best Buy; Sales Rule; Cost Cuts Just Won’t “Cut it”

Best Buy seemed like such a slam-dunk when Circuit City announced it would go belly up and complete liquidating stores in March 2009. At that time, investors were willing to look past dismal monthly CE data as well as the Amazon market share writing on the wall. Some called the monthly data “noise” and others simply could not get past the simple math of one goes away one gets stronger.

Simple math does not always work. Best Buy has declined 36% since Circuit City, the #2 electronics retailer at the time, shut its doors. While BBY’s FQ4 earnings beat the Street on cost controls, the revenue line is not giving investors any reason to believe this ship is headed in the right direction. Same store sales for the all-important holiday quarter declined 2.4%, a deterioration from December trends of -1.2%. The deterioration was widespread as comps worsened in all categories.

There are several challenges for Best Buy. First, the size of the store print is simply too big as more and more Consumer Electronics sales shift online. And it certainly does not help that Amazon has a tax advantage (for now) and offers cheaper products. Price transparency is a hurdle as price comparisons are just a click away on smart phones. Amazon turned up the heat this holiday by encouraging shoppers to scan prices at physical stores on smart phones only to offer further price discounts if the consumer left the store to shop online.

I am guessing Best Buy does not approve of consumers using stores as a showroom but that seems to be the reality. And while the company calls out customer service as a point of differentiation, I have to wonder if they acknowledge what it happening (just a little) as they guided for comps declines of 2-4% this year.

Best Buy’s solution for now. Today BBY announced it will close 50 US big box stores this year, a move in the right direction. The question is how many large stores do we really need and can the company close stores quickly enough as leases roll off. But it is a start. Second, the company announced it will reduce $800M in costs by 2015 so the company can invest in transforming the business (remodels, more mobile stores, invest in pricing). This includes corporate staff reductions, fewer consultants, IT savings, and supply chain efficiencies to name a few. My question? If there was so much fat hanging around why has it been hanging around this long?

Best Buy has gone through cost cutting initiatives in the past and in the past the Street rewarded the stock. However, this time is different. With prolonged comps store sales declines and no sign of this trend changing anytime soon cost cuts just won’t “cut it”


Social Share Button

Older posts «